Hokie Hope

A day of remembrance to remember the 32 Virginia Tech students and faculty murdered on Monday.

Live365 Pays Royalties to Artists, Labels and Songwriters

Live365 has released this statement about the new performance royalty rates that the Copyright Royalty Board announced on March 2:

It has always been Live365’s mission to support artists and pay our fair share of royalties. Since its inception in 1999, Live365 has always paid both composer royalties (to ASCAP, BMI and SESAC) and performance royalties (to SoundExchange). Over the last few years, we’ve paid millions to SoundExchange alone on behalf of our broadcasters and listeners.

It’s all about supporting artists who write and perform the songs we enjoy. This is a core mission behind Live365. Some of this support comes from promotion, airtime, so artists’ works can be heard. Some comes from cash in the form of ROYALTIES. Last year, Live365 paid SoundExchange, the collector of sound recording royalties, more than $1 million (for the performing musicians and singers) on behalf of our broadcasters and have continually paid royalties since day one of our service.

To take the administrative burden of tracking Live365 stations off SoundExchange and our broadcasters’ back, we also created and provided for our stations an entire data management system that tracks which songs were heard, by how many persons, providing SoundExchange with a single, compiled report insuring thousands of Internet stations are law abiding webcasters that do report and pay royalties. And that’s just one type of royalties. Live365 and its broadcasters do the same reporting and paying for the song writers and composers through contracts with their royalty organizations, ASCAP, BMI and SESAC.

What we do not understand is why Internet radio is saddled with the highest rates. Satellite services, such as Sirius or XM, and cable TV music providers, such as Music Choice, pay nearly 50% less for the same royalties. AM & FM stations pay NO sound recording royalties at all. If all parties were putting in their share, if there was parity for all broadcasters, there would be no need to double, nearly triple the royalty rates for Internet radio as the government established Copyright Royalty Board has done.

Many small, non-profit and public service stations with little or no revenue will be stopped from broadcasting on the Internet under these new rates which will eliminate many of the music you can’t find on AM, FM, satellite, or cable radio. If these rates stay in place, we’d expect 80% of Live365 stations, specifically those in niche genres with unique content unavailable elsewhere, will have no choice but to shut down. Our 260 genres would probably be reduced to 10 and become homogenized as AM/FM radio. As an example, this year’s “pay for performance per listener” rate of $0.0011 may seem tiny, but one Internet radio station that broadcasts 15 songs an hour to even 500 listeners would pay SoundExchange $72,270 a year for sound recording royalties alone, not to mention their other costs for composition royalties, hosting, bandwidth, music library and their programming. Compare that to the current under $1,000 average price of broadcasting on Live365.

Internet radio, such as Live365, is the only source most people have for jazz, classical, folk and many other types of music in niche genres. Many of these genres are key elements of American culture, and Internet radio is one of our best resources for preserving them. Internet radio reaches the entire world and helps spread the exchange of cultures and goodwill to people everywhere.

For more information, visit: http://www.live365.com/choice/.

Marvin Kane 410-298-2013 telemarketing spam

I just received a pre-recorded telemarketing call offering me the chance to refinance my home. The caller ID said “Marvin Kane” at (410) 298-2013. No information was on the call except to leave a message if I was interested. I left a message all right. I rarely use 4 letter words, but people running a scam like this, people breaking federal laws, are the ones who get to hear me use bad words.

And you know what? This loser will make some money off of it, because a few people out there will leave their info and refinance through his company. The guideline to stop this kind of predator: Never buy anything from any unsolicited advertising! That goes for fax, email, phone calls, mail. If people would stop feeding the sharks, the sharks will go away. But enough people out there don’t want to hurt someone’s feelings, or are lonely, or aren’t too bright; that they fall for this stuff. Stop it!

I have filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, for all the good it will do. I’m on the Do Not Call list.

New Royalty Ruling Leaves the Future of Internet Radio in Doubt

I have operated an Internet-based Christmas music radio station since November 2004. In 2006 I took the station professional, and in December 2006 ended up being the third most popular station of the approximate 7,000 stations at Live365.

On March 2, the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) issued the significantly higher new royalty rates for Internet radio for the 2006-2010 period. They changed the guidelines for how royalties are calculated for the music that is played on Internet Radio stations. The old guidelines were based on a percentage of the money earned by an online station, with a baseline fee of $2,000. So for 2006 (and 2007) I paid $2,000 per year to legally broadcast Christmas music. I earned $1,076.27 in 2006. So my love of Christmas music cost me around $933 for the year (not including the time I put into the station). It was definitely worth it.

The new guidelines ignores income, and charges broadcasters for each listener that hears each song. The rate for 2006 is to be $.0008 per listener per song. So the bill for me for 2006 will be approximately $6,276.32. This of course cannot continue, since I don’t want to put my family into the poorhouse. So I have been forced to reduce the number of listeners that can listen to the stations at one time.

More information is available at the Live 365 web site: New Royalty Rates Threaten Small and Large Broadcasters.

I will post new information as it becomes available.

Copyright Conundrum

One of the most popular sections of PlanetMike is my Jokes collection (which I have about two years of updates to add to it!). A few of the items listed in there aren’t actually jokes, but are inspirational tales, notes, or poems. One of these was titled “Christmas List.” I received it in my email on Monday, December 22, 1997, at 12:35:57 Eastern time. I don’t know who sent it to me though. It was credited as “Author Unknown.”

Last July, I received an email from Shelby Hairston Pilkington who claimed to be the author. I wrote her back:

Thanks for writing in, I added in a your name as author. Do you have any proof that you wrote this? I’m not contesting it, but I know that these types of claims can get nasty. I remember the author of “Footprints in the Sand” is highly contested, as 3 different people claim to be the author. Best wishes, Michael

She responded that she had letters to 35 friends and relatives from December 1996 showing she was the author.

Then earlier this week I received an anonymous comment on my blog (errors and typos in the original comment not corrected):

please take christmas list {poem} by shelby hairston pilkington off your web site unless you give credit to the real author of this poem Helen Steiner Rice. written in 1949 it is in a book published by random house christmas blessings and also available by the helen steiner rice foundation in ohio. shelby hairaton whoever is a fake and thief without honor, This is how history changes.

I contacted The Helen Steiner Rice Foundation and asked them if the late Ms. Rice was the original author of the poem. Their response:

Mrs. Rice is indeed the author of the Christmas poem. She wrote it as her personal Christmas Card in 1949. Others on the Internet are taking credit for this poem, and our legal team is aware of the problem.

From Googling, I see that the author is listed as unknown, as Ms. Pilkington, or as Ms. Rice. I surely don’t wish to get caught in the middle of this mess, so I have removed the poem from my web site, except for the line quoted above.

What I Don’t Miss About Working in Washington DC

It’s now been two weeks since I left my full-time job for the Center for Democracy & Technology to become a stay-at-home contractor. And there are a few things I don’t miss about being in DC:

  1. Spending at least one hour each way traveling
  2. The sounds of people yakking on their cell phones on the bus
  3. Having to get up around 5:45 each morning
  4. Seeing my bus pass me by on my way to the stop
  5. Stupid police not allowing me to walk through Lafayette Square while White House employees can
  6. Idiots like the tractor nut, or the van-full-of-explosives-at-the-White-House-gate nut.
  7. Rude bus drivers
  8. The chance of being killed by terrorists (I was in DC two blocks from the White House on 9/11)

Odd, almost all of these are directly related to commuting headaches and problems.

What I Miss About Working in Washington DC

It’s now been two weeks since I left my full-time job for the Center for Democracy & Technology to become a stay-at-home contractor. And there are a few things I miss about being in DC:

  1. Seeing the monuments from up close (from the car or bus window usually)
  2. Waiting for the evening bus at the White House
  3. Being stopped in traffic when the Vice President goes by on his way to work
  4. The tourists running around taking pictures of everything
  5. The trees and flowers when they bloom in the Spring

The Donald’s Most Important Real-life Advice

From Guy Kawasaki’s blog, an interview with Donald Trump

Question: TV is TV, real life is real life: What’s the most important real-life advice you can give to an entrepreneur?

Answer: You have to love what you do. Without passion, great success is hard to come by. An entrepreneur will have tough times if he or she isn’t passionate about what they’re doing. People who love what they’re doing don’t give up. It’s never even a consideration. It’s a pretty simple formula.

I think that’s one reason why I’m leaving my full-time day job as the webmaster for the Center for Democracy & Technology, and going to stay at home and work on some web projects that I am having a blast doing. CDT still is doing great, important work, but I’m not loving slogging through HTMLizing pages, and spending two hours a day commuting.